We’ve already seen that at least one sect of the Mannist religion (Flora’s) frowns on inter-species mating. Ostensibly because different-species couples can’t produce cubs.
Not out of line with what we’ve seen thus far, tho perhaps a little more extreme example of it.
sure it can, the laws specifically state that ya know having sex with a kid as an adult isnt allowed kids fucking kids is perfectly fine though there is ofcourse a concern here due to the forced nature of their sexual development, but as far as i can tell it’s just healthy experimentation and exploration, it’s up to a therapist to determine it further, not a random passerby.
I’m not so sure about that, even if I’m not a lawyer. A little kid cannot get a driver’s license either. Years ago there was a competition for youngest person who could fly a real airplane and that ended when a little girl got killed during such a flight.
Isn’t that the whole idea of the webcomic? That the kids are having sex because they are psychologically damaged, not because they are normal and the adults have to deal with their being damaged?
Yeah, cause there is a law that says you have to be a certain age to get a drivers license, there is no law that states you HAVE to be a certain age to have sex, just that if you are above a certain age you cant have sex with people below a certain age
I agree. In my OC’s civilization, Cubs can have sex or explore sex in private or in public (in areas that are designated safe places where only authorized adults such as parents/guardians or legal entities can discretely supervise), and brothels are safe places as well, but under no circumstances are adults allowed to have sex with cubs. They are aware that the cubs will see adults having sex at home or in private since they don’t treat something that is natural as forbidden, considering that all species on their world treats sex not only as procreation, but as bonding, mentally… Read more »
I have an OC of my own, originally written to satirize furry sex stories, the idea that anthropomorphic animals are not better than human, just different. Contrary to human fantasy, they are More inhibited about sex than humans are, even if different species cannot interbreed. Also, prostitutes are just as miserable there as they are among humans. My stories feature a group of animal-people scientists exploring Earthian society, and several of them reach one conclusion: Commission: Not so different by Granitoons on DeviantArt
Even so, I cannot imagine he would like two kits having sex either, whatever the species.
Cedar Blankenship
12 days ago
#4669
Okay I do not like that look on Benni’s face in the final panel. Does it seem like he knows the person they were brought to see, and it’s not good? Oh I really hope he’s just scared of what rumors might get spread about him, and nothing else.
My main concern for Benni RN is his reaction to “Henry”.
He puts up a brief attempt to object, then shuts down and *obeys*.
I was worried initially about him losing it and going off on the adult, but this is the other shoe dropping. The opposite reaction.
Benni’s conditioning runs so deep that he instantly goes submissive to any adult authority. It isn’t really surprising as such, but it does show the depth of how his mind has been affected.
Because Benni is submissive due to his past abuse. Tanya is trying to make sure that Benni isn’t going to be wrongfully accused, so she’s not going to run away unless Benni is running away with her.
It’s not a fake accusation… The older guy IS touching her, and was touching both her and Benni BOTH, against their will… He has grabbed BOTH their arms and has essentially taken them with him against their will… (kidnapping) The only beings touching them WITH their permission were each other… It’s true that they were engaging in activities that, under most current state laws in America, constitute what is called “child-on-child sexual abuse”, which is differentiated from normative sexual play or anatomical curiosity and exploration (e.g. “playing doctor”) because child-on-child sexual abuse is an overt and deliberate action directed at sexual stimulation,… Read more »
You stated… “He did not touch them sexually.”… …Here’s a quote from an attorney…Stephen Ross Cohen Family Law Attorney in Rancho Palos Verdes, CA “Without permission touching a minor you could be charged with battery or assault on a person. Depending on the age and nature of the touching and age difference you could be charged with a variety of abuse charges, whether the touching was sexual in nature or not. The result is that without permission, you should not touch anyone even a friend. Where they are of the opposite sex it is even more dangerous, no means no!”… Read more »
You even said it in the statement above though. “Depending on the age and nature of the touching.” In this case the nature of him touching them was to break up what he saw as an inappropriate act between two minors. Hence the nature of the touching would be within reason. I mean how ridiculous can you be? If that strict black and white definition really amounted to anything you could use that against cops. Cause isn’t a cop touching someone to arrested them be counted as unwanted contact? Or when a cop arrested someone and takes them to jail… Read more »
SailorCakes said… “You even said it in the statement above though. “Depending on the age and nature of the touching.” In this case the nature of him touching them was to break up what he saw as an inappropriate act between two minors. Hence the nature of the touching would be within reason.”… …According to the general construct of the lay, the “nature of the touching” has less to do with the “intent” of the one doing the touching (which is difficult to prove in court), and more to do with the evidential physicality of the touch itself… In other words… Read more »
Ok, I wasn’t expecting the racist behavior but it definitely lowers my opinion of the old dog. I forget sometimes that interspecies relations are looked down on by some people in this world. Anyway, let’s hope the clerk is more rational.
He can’t do anything legally here either; there’s no law against minors having sex with other minors, only against minors getting with adults. He is not their father, grandfather or guardian; it’s not his business what they do. Even when he told the clerk to call the police, he claimed it was because Benni “violated” Tanya, not because of their age.
It doesn’t matter what Henry’s motive was; children are not miniature adults. There is a minimum age when a person can have sex, just as there is a minimum age when you can drive a car, or buy alcohol, or cigarettes, or go to an adults-only establishment. If a child commits a crime, they are treated differently as if they were an adult.
And for the record, a lot of police informers are criminal scum themselves; nonetheless law enforcement depends on them to learn about crimes being committed.
AFAIR calling police on a couple of kids having sex, and the police determine that it was consensual, generates lectures in most cases towards all parties involved.
The thing you’re not grasping here is that there was no crime; the point of age of consent is to protect children from adults, which is why an adult who goes after a minor will end up in jail (and rightly so). Yet, you never hear about minors going to jail for having sex with other minors because again, that’s not a crime. The only crime that they could realistically be charged with is public indecency and considered their age, they’d just get a slap on the wrist. Now, obviously two minors having sex is not a good thing, especially… Read more »
I wouldn’t know because I’m not a lawyer, but even minors can’t just do anything they want. They cannot legally be employed or sign a legal contract; I doubt they could claim to have consensual sex either.
You’re right,…it DOESN’T matter what Henry’s motive was,…he’s actually committing two crimes here: assault by manhandling those kids without the parent’s permission, and kidnapping (based on federal and state law) by physically forcing them from one place to another against their will, and especially if the idea is to confine them somewhere (like that store), even if it’s to wait for the police… There are literally laws in place (in our world) to punish people for those very specific crimes, ESPECIALLY for adults doing that to kids… But when it comes to kids and sexual experimentation between them, you are… Read more »
Never mind the sex. These are little kids far away from any supervising adults. I don’t think it would be considered kidnapping for, say, taking a child away from the middle of a busy street.
I’m sorry,…and I truly don’t mean this as an insult,…but it doesn’t matter if you “think” it would be considered kidnapping, under the circumstances in which these two kids were abducted and taken away from that scene by that fisherman… It absolutely WOULD hold up in court as kidnapping, if charges were pressed against that fisherman… That’s not to say a defending lawyer couldn’t find ways of decreasing the charge and punishment in court, because it becomes the judge’s discretion at the end,…but it definitely falls into the realm of kidnapping behavior… However,…in your example of “taking a child away… Read more »
I am reminded of an episode of the “Life Goes On” TV show from years ago where the father squeezes a woman who was choking on food that was lodged in her throat, saving her life. The father then is served papers, being sued by the woman for breaking her rib. At the end of the show, the father mentions that there is a “Good Samaritan” law for which most such lawsuits are thrown out of court. Henry may not be likable, but I doubt he would be prosecuted for what he had done.
In legal terms, a good Samaritan is anyone who renders aid in an emergency to an injured or ill person. Generally, if the victim is unconscious or unresponsive, a good Samaritan can help them on the grounds of implied consent. If the person is conscious and can reasonably respond, a would-be rescuer should ask permission first. This law does not apply to the circumstances of this comic as pertains to the behaviors of the fisherman with these children…
As racist as this guy sounds, it makes me wonder if any surviving mentions of “dog is man’s best friend” has lead to a kind of canine supremacist movement (thinking canines are the favored of Man over other species) in this world, the Kennel Klub Klan maybe? Because this old dog sounds like a card carrying member.
That’s an amazingly creative concept, from a story-telling standpoint! In a world where man is long-gone, but is now perceived as “god-like” by the new sentient/sapient species, it would make total sense that ancient adages like “dog is man’s best friend” could lead to supremacist diatribe and zealotry… I’m only just now getting a good feel for the way the religion in this world works, but seeing how those concepts leak out into this current anthro-society, creating the ethical dilemmas in this world, would be cool to see Campion explore and expound upon.
Rhio2k
7 days ago
#4701
Actually surprised he didn’t give Benni a caning with that pole. For all his outrage, he has remarkable restraint.
And yeah, chiming in on the earlier conversation: all this guy seems to care about is the interspecies sex, not that kids are having sex in the first place.
Henry might have the wrong motive for his interference, but that doesn’t mean he had no right to intervene. And Benni knows enough to realize there was no point in his trying to run off-it failed to help him in the past.
It’s not about any “right” to intervene, it’s about “authority”… The police actually have such authority, private citizens do not… In the past, such actions perpetrated by an individual were called “vigilantism”. This old fisherman approached the situation as if he had authority over those children, and he simply didn’t. Instead he tried to take the law into his own hands. Let me give you a brief history about why that’s a bad thing to do… Classical vigilantism dates back to frontier days of the Old West. During this time, volunteer associations called vigilante committees would aggressively pursue suspected thieves, alcoholics, and others… Read more »
Sorry that is a very poor comparison. If you want something more appropriate, try intervening to stop a fight, or finding minors playing with matches. And if you want a real picture of race, the reality is that it is the nonwhites who commit the most violence against each other and against whites. Very rarely do whites commit violence against nonwhites, and oftentimes it is self-defense. The news media showed Trayvon Martin as a sweet little cherub, when in reality he was a big thug who tried to beat George Zimmermann to death. Why people stopped trusting the news media-they… Read more »
No,…I must call you on that fallacy… “Black-on-Black Crime” Is a Dangerous Myth… A report released by the U.S. Department of Justice in 2017 found that of all the violent crimes committed between 2012 and 2015, 22.7% were committed by Black people, and 63% of those were committed against other Black people. This is in comparison to 44% of all violent crimes committed by white people, 57% of which were committed against other white people. According to this data, white people commit crimes against other white people at about the same rate that Black people do against other Black people.… Read more »
You can come up with any crank statements, and everything I said is absolutely true. You sound like some sort of white goofball that even black people would laugh at. I’m not interested in your cockamamie conspiracy theories, so take a hike. I know what real life is like. My true nature is that I don’t live in your fantasy world.
Nope, the garbage you are spewing is wrong, and misguided, and utterly the narrative of conservative trash-talk… You have bought into the biggest conspiracy theory of all time,…”white supremacy”… None of what you said is “absolutely true”,…because absolutist statements like that are, by their very definition, quite often false… You said “it is the nonwhites who commit the most violence against each other and against whites”… …That is absolutely false, and I quoted direct sources that prove it so… You said “Very rarely do whites commit violence against nonwhites, and oftentimes it is self-defense.”… …That’s pure garbage, even if you ONLY… Read more »
Sheesh, you make Patrick Buchanan look normal. You can cherry pick any data you want, but I’m nowhere near gullible enough to fall for it, and very few people are. I’ve met other hothead wingnuts like you before, and there is no point telling you facts because like I said you live in fantasyland. Maybe you think all those women are lying about Bill Cosby too. Never mind that it was a fellow BLACK comedian, Hannibal Burress, who exposed his crimes to the world.
No, you don’t live a sheltered life,…you live a delusional one…one literally dripping in willful ignorance “bubbo”… You neo-conservatives do nothing BUT “cherry pick” crap and present it as truth… Your fantasy-land is something you think Trump can deliver to you, and you were on the side of literal seditious insurrectionists in the hopes of getting it… You may think I’m “hot-headed”, but what you’ve proven to be is “soft-headed”… You bring up Bill Cosby and his vile actions against women, and YET you are willing to state (in other comments on Deviant Art) that Trump brought this country “jobs,… Read more »
No, I cherry pick nothing. I tell the WHOLE truth, and when you cannot refute what I say, you resort to poo flinging. Yes, Trump did bring us jobs, peace, and prosperity, while all these allegations against Trump have been discredited time and time again. I’m not delusional or stupid, you are. Go play with your crayons and leave adult conversations to us adults. You’re not hot-headed, you’re empty-headed. Reality sucks dunnit?
Again, we’re at ad hominem attacks, this is not an acceptable way to have a discussion and be inside the rules of this comment section.
As said before and when you agree to the click through to even visit here; this comic covers many sensitive topics and keeping the comments civil is mandatory.
Long Tom, it has now happened across the two most recent comment threads that you have jumped into direct attacks on other commenters for essentially calling you out with direct evidence and rebuttals of your statements and claims.
Once more and there will have to be repercussions.
Like I said, I’m being bullied and you blame me. I told Jadugara that I did not believe him, and he responds by making personal attacks on me. So it’s my fault?
Do us both a favor and stop blaming me when I fight back against a bully. I’m not gaslighting but simply stating facts.
And with the police getting called, KPS will be involved. Hopefully they will understand that both Tanya and Benni were ‘exploring’ with each other due to recent and past events.
One thing is for certain is that both Benni and Tanya are losing a lot of their freedoms for a long time as well as being on the receiving end of both Flora’s and Colinn’s disappointment.
By clicking 'YES', you agree that you are over the age of 18, and that you agree with the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy of this site.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By pressing 'OK' you accept the terms of our privacy policy.OkPrivacy policy
Okay, unexpected racist(speciesist?) turn. Would his reaction have been different if they were both canine?
We’ve already seen that at least one sect of the Mannist religion (Flora’s) frowns on inter-species mating. Ostensibly because different-species couples can’t produce cubs.
Not out of line with what we’ve seen thus far, tho perhaps a little more extreme example of it.
Um, they are both underage.
That’s kind of a separate issue from the “Speciesist” angle
Speciesist or not, two underage children having sex, even consensual, cannot be ignored.
sure it can, the laws specifically state that ya know having sex with a kid as an adult isnt allowed kids fucking kids is perfectly fine though there is ofcourse a concern here due to the forced nature of their sexual development, but as far as i can tell it’s just healthy experimentation and exploration, it’s up to a therapist to determine it further, not a random passerby.
I’m not so sure about that, even if I’m not a lawyer. A little kid cannot get a driver’s license either. Years ago there was a competition for youngest person who could fly a real airplane and that ended when a little girl got killed during such a flight.
You,re reading the “kids having sex” webcominc. raising up moral issues about it is about the most hypocritical thing you can do
Isn’t that the whole idea of the webcomic? That the kids are having sex because they are psychologically damaged, not because they are normal and the adults have to deal with their being damaged?
Yeah, cause there is a law that says you have to be a certain age to get a drivers license, there is no law that states you HAVE to be a certain age to have sex, just that if you are above a certain age you cant have sex with people below a certain age
I agree. In my OC’s civilization, Cubs can have sex or explore sex in private or in public (in areas that are designated safe places where only authorized adults such as parents/guardians or legal entities can discretely supervise), and brothels are safe places as well, but under no circumstances are adults allowed to have sex with cubs. They are aware that the cubs will see adults having sex at home or in private since they don’t treat something that is natural as forbidden, considering that all species on their world treats sex not only as procreation, but as bonding, mentally… Read more »
I have an OC of my own, originally written to satirize furry sex stories, the idea that anthropomorphic animals are not better than human, just different. Contrary to human fantasy, they are More inhibited about sex than humans are, even if different species cannot interbreed. Also, prostitutes are just as miserable there as they are among humans. My stories feature a group of animal-people scientists exploring Earthian society, and several of them reach one conclusion: Commission: Not so different by Granitoons on DeviantArt
hopefully the other guy is not as racist and actually listen to tanya
Even so, I cannot imagine he would like two kits having sex either, whatever the species.
Okay I do not like that look on Benni’s face in the final panel. Does it seem like he knows the person they were brought to see, and it’s not good? Oh I really hope he’s just scared of what rumors might get spread about him, and nothing else.
My main concern for Benni RN is his reaction to “Henry”.
He puts up a brief attempt to object, then shuts down and *obeys*.
I was worried initially about him losing it and going off on the adult, but this is the other shoe dropping. The opposite reaction.
Benni’s conditioning runs so deep that he instantly goes submissive to any adult authority. It isn’t really surprising as such, but it does show the depth of how his mind has been affected.
Yeah, I honestly question why they didn’t just try to run from the guy; he has no authority over either of them.
Because Benni is submissive due to his past abuse. Tanya is trying to make sure that Benni isn’t going to be wrongfully accused, so she’s not going to run away unless Benni is running away with her.
Yeah. I agree. That expression is one of shock and trepidation.
i hope tanya beats him over the head with a wrench
Or screams really loud that the guy was touching her, and then she and Benni book it outta there in the confusion.
Fake accusations are never a good idea.
It’s not a fake accusation… The older guy IS touching her, and was touching both her and Benni BOTH, against their will… He has grabbed BOTH their arms and has essentially taken them with him against their will… (kidnapping) The only beings touching them WITH their permission were each other… It’s true that they were engaging in activities that, under most current state laws in America, constitute what is called “child-on-child sexual abuse”, which is differentiated from normative sexual play or anatomical curiosity and exploration (e.g. “playing doctor”) because child-on-child sexual abuse is an overt and deliberate action directed at sexual stimulation,… Read more »
He did not touch them sexually. Are you a lawyer? Taking kids away from a place does not count as kidnapping.
You stated… “He did not touch them sexually.”… …Here’s a quote from an attorney…Stephen Ross Cohen Family Law Attorney in Rancho Palos Verdes, CA “Without permission touching a minor you could be charged with battery or assault on a person. Depending on the age and nature of the touching and age difference you could be charged with a variety of abuse charges, whether the touching was sexual in nature or not. The result is that without permission, you should not touch anyone even a friend. Where they are of the opposite sex it is even more dangerous, no means no!”… Read more »
You even said it in the statement above though. “Depending on the age and nature of the touching.” In this case the nature of him touching them was to break up what he saw as an inappropriate act between two minors. Hence the nature of the touching would be within reason. I mean how ridiculous can you be? If that strict black and white definition really amounted to anything you could use that against cops. Cause isn’t a cop touching someone to arrested them be counted as unwanted contact? Or when a cop arrested someone and takes them to jail… Read more »
SailorCakes said… “You even said it in the statement above though. “Depending on the age and nature of the touching.” In this case the nature of him touching them was to break up what he saw as an inappropriate act between two minors. Hence the nature of the touching would be within reason.”… …According to the general construct of the lay, the “nature of the touching” has less to do with the “intent” of the one doing the touching (which is difficult to prove in court), and more to do with the evidential physicality of the touch itself… In other words… Read more »
Ok, I wasn’t expecting the racist behavior but it definitely lowers my opinion of the old dog. I forget sometimes that interspecies relations are looked down on by some people in this world. Anyway, let’s hope the clerk is more rational.
If the two of them were adults, Henry might have been upset by what they did but could hardly do anything legally about it.
He can’t do anything legally here either; there’s no law against minors having sex with other minors, only against minors getting with adults. He is not their father, grandfather or guardian; it’s not his business what they do. Even when he told the clerk to call the police, he claimed it was because Benni “violated” Tanya, not because of their age.
It doesn’t matter what Henry’s motive was; children are not miniature adults. There is a minimum age when a person can have sex, just as there is a minimum age when you can drive a car, or buy alcohol, or cigarettes, or go to an adults-only establishment. If a child commits a crime, they are treated differently as if they were an adult.
And for the record, a lot of police informers are criminal scum themselves; nonetheless law enforcement depends on them to learn about crimes being committed.
AFAIR calling police on a couple of kids having sex, and the police determine that it was consensual, generates lectures in most cases towards all parties involved.
Ever heard of the term “statutory rape”?
The thing you’re not grasping here is that there was no crime; the point of age of consent is to protect children from adults, which is why an adult who goes after a minor will end up in jail (and rightly so). Yet, you never hear about minors going to jail for having sex with other minors because again, that’s not a crime. The only crime that they could realistically be charged with is public indecency and considered their age, they’d just get a slap on the wrist. Now, obviously two minors having sex is not a good thing, especially… Read more »
I wouldn’t know because I’m not a lawyer, but even minors can’t just do anything they want. They cannot legally be employed or sign a legal contract; I doubt they could claim to have consensual sex either.
And that’s where you have the psychoanalysts getting involved and determining if there was any undue coercion involved.
You’re right,…it DOESN’T matter what Henry’s motive was,…he’s actually committing two crimes here: assault by manhandling those kids without the parent’s permission, and kidnapping (based on federal and state law) by physically forcing them from one place to another against their will, and especially if the idea is to confine them somewhere (like that store), even if it’s to wait for the police… There are literally laws in place (in our world) to punish people for those very specific crimes, ESPECIALLY for adults doing that to kids… But when it comes to kids and sexual experimentation between them, you are… Read more »
Never mind the sex. These are little kids far away from any supervising adults. I don’t think it would be considered kidnapping for, say, taking a child away from the middle of a busy street.
I’m sorry,…and I truly don’t mean this as an insult,…but it doesn’t matter if you “think” it would be considered kidnapping, under the circumstances in which these two kids were abducted and taken away from that scene by that fisherman… It absolutely WOULD hold up in court as kidnapping, if charges were pressed against that fisherman… That’s not to say a defending lawyer couldn’t find ways of decreasing the charge and punishment in court, because it becomes the judge’s discretion at the end,…but it definitely falls into the realm of kidnapping behavior… However,…in your example of “taking a child away… Read more »
I am reminded of an episode of the “Life Goes On” TV show from years ago where the father squeezes a woman who was choking on food that was lodged in her throat, saving her life. The father then is served papers, being sued by the woman for breaking her rib. At the end of the show, the father mentions that there is a “Good Samaritan” law for which most such lawsuits are thrown out of court. Henry may not be likable, but I doubt he would be prosecuted for what he had done.
In legal terms, a good Samaritan is anyone who renders aid in an emergency to an injured or ill person. Generally, if the victim is unconscious or unresponsive, a good Samaritan can help them on the grounds of implied consent. If the person is conscious and can reasonably respond, a would-be rescuer should ask permission first. This law does not apply to the circumstances of this comic as pertains to the behaviors of the fisherman with these children…
As racist as this guy sounds, it makes me wonder if any surviving mentions of “dog is man’s best friend” has lead to a kind of canine supremacist movement (thinking canines are the favored of Man over other species) in this world, the Kennel Klub Klan maybe? Because this old dog sounds like a card carrying member.
Oof, I hadn’t even thought of that, but now that you say it, I can see it.
That’s an amazingly creative concept, from a story-telling standpoint! In a world where man is long-gone, but is now perceived as “god-like” by the new sentient/sapient species, it would make total sense that ancient adages like “dog is man’s best friend” could lead to supremacist diatribe and zealotry… I’m only just now getting a good feel for the way the religion in this world works, but seeing how those concepts leak out into this current anthro-society, creating the ethical dilemmas in this world, would be cool to see Campion explore and expound upon.
Actually surprised he didn’t give Benni a caning with that pole. For all his outrage, he has remarkable restraint.
And yeah, chiming in on the earlier conversation: all this guy seems to care about is the interspecies sex, not that kids are having sex in the first place.
Henry might have the wrong motive for his interference, but that doesn’t mean he had no right to intervene. And Benni knows enough to realize there was no point in his trying to run off-it failed to help him in the past.
Plus Benni isn’t the kind to leave a friend behind.
True, Tanya still has a bum foot.
Oh and that cad made her WALK on it!
It’s not about any “right” to intervene, it’s about “authority”… The police actually have such authority, private citizens do not… In the past, such actions perpetrated by an individual were called “vigilantism”. This old fisherman approached the situation as if he had authority over those children, and he simply didn’t. Instead he tried to take the law into his own hands. Let me give you a brief history about why that’s a bad thing to do… Classical vigilantism dates back to frontier days of the Old West. During this time, volunteer associations called vigilante committees would aggressively pursue suspected thieves, alcoholics, and others… Read more »
Sorry that is a very poor comparison. If you want something more appropriate, try intervening to stop a fight, or finding minors playing with matches. And if you want a real picture of race, the reality is that it is the nonwhites who commit the most violence against each other and against whites. Very rarely do whites commit violence against nonwhites, and oftentimes it is self-defense. The news media showed Trayvon Martin as a sweet little cherub, when in reality he was a big thug who tried to beat George Zimmermann to death. Why people stopped trusting the news media-they… Read more »
No,…I must call you on that fallacy… “Black-on-Black Crime” Is a Dangerous Myth… A report released by the U.S. Department of Justice in 2017 found that of all the violent crimes committed between 2012 and 2015, 22.7% were committed by Black people, and 63% of those were committed against other Black people. This is in comparison to 44% of all violent crimes committed by white people, 57% of which were committed against other white people. According to this data, white people commit crimes against other white people at about the same rate that Black people do against other Black people.… Read more »
You can come up with any crank statements, and everything I said is absolutely true. You sound like some sort of white goofball that even black people would laugh at. I’m not interested in your cockamamie conspiracy theories, so take a hike. I know what real life is like. My true nature is that I don’t live in your fantasy world.
Nope, the garbage you are spewing is wrong, and misguided, and utterly the narrative of conservative trash-talk… You have bought into the biggest conspiracy theory of all time,…”white supremacy”… None of what you said is “absolutely true”,…because absolutist statements like that are, by their very definition, quite often false… You said “it is the nonwhites who commit the most violence against each other and against whites”… …That is absolutely false, and I quoted direct sources that prove it so… You said “Very rarely do whites commit violence against nonwhites, and oftentimes it is self-defense.”… …That’s pure garbage, even if you ONLY… Read more »
Sheesh, you make Patrick Buchanan look normal. You can cherry pick any data you want, but I’m nowhere near gullible enough to fall for it, and very few people are. I’ve met other hothead wingnuts like you before, and there is no point telling you facts because like I said you live in fantasyland. Maybe you think all those women are lying about Bill Cosby too. Never mind that it was a fellow BLACK comedian, Hannibal Burress, who exposed his crimes to the world.
Unlike you, bubbo, I don’t live a sheltered life.
No, you don’t live a sheltered life,…you live a delusional one…one literally dripping in willful ignorance “bubbo”… You neo-conservatives do nothing BUT “cherry pick” crap and present it as truth… Your fantasy-land is something you think Trump can deliver to you, and you were on the side of literal seditious insurrectionists in the hopes of getting it… You may think I’m “hot-headed”, but what you’ve proven to be is “soft-headed”… You bring up Bill Cosby and his vile actions against women, and YET you are willing to state (in other comments on Deviant Art) that Trump brought this country “jobs,… Read more »
No, I cherry pick nothing. I tell the WHOLE truth, and when you cannot refute what I say, you resort to poo flinging. Yes, Trump did bring us jobs, peace, and prosperity, while all these allegations against Trump have been discredited time and time again. I’m not delusional or stupid, you are. Go play with your crayons and leave adult conversations to us adults. You’re not hot-headed, you’re empty-headed. Reality sucks dunnit?
Again, we’re at ad hominem attacks, this is not an acceptable way to have a discussion and be inside the rules of this comment section.
As said before and when you agree to the click through to even visit here; this comic covers many sensitive topics and keeping the comments civil is mandatory.
Long Tom, it has now happened across the two most recent comment threads that you have jumped into direct attacks on other commenters for essentially calling you out with direct evidence and rebuttals of your statements and claims.
Once more and there will have to be repercussions.
Ah yes, blame the victim when harassed by a bully. I attacked other commentors for bullying me, not the other way around.
I know gaslighting is a super common and relied on method of bullying, but it’s not going to be accepted here.
Please recenter yourself in these discussions to avoid further attacks is all that is being asked.
Like I said, I’m being bullied and you blame me. I told Jadugara that I did not believe him, and he responds by making personal attacks on me. So it’s my fault?
Do us both a favor and stop blaming me when I fight back against a bully. I’m not gaslighting but simply stating facts.
Last chance Tom.
And with the police getting called, KPS will be involved. Hopefully they will understand that both Tanya and Benni were ‘exploring’ with each other due to recent and past events.
One thing is for certain is that both Benni and Tanya are losing a lot of their freedoms for a long time as well as being on the receiving end of both Flora’s and Colinn’s disappointment.
I think this event would likely also result in Benni being taken out of Flora’s care 😓
Oh. Racism🎉 How…fun
Again, little kids are not miniature adults: Jessica Dubroff – Wikipedia